<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Church Planting</title>
	<link>http://shauger.blogspot.com/shauger9_008.htm</link>
	<description>This web site has been created technology from Avanquest Publishing USA, Inc.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Web Easy by Avanquest Publishing USA, Inc.</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Church Planting</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT size="2"><FONT face="Arial Narrow"><STRONG>I am currently reading a paper by Dr. Tim Keller, Senior Pastor at Redeemer Presbyterian Church in NYC.</STRONG>&nbsp;He does a great job of defining from Scripture why the local church should be about multiplying itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;The full article is available&nbsp;from the link on the next page.&nbsp; I will try to highlight a few key points and include some quotes:</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2"></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2">Two features are noted about the NT ministry that are key, particularly in Acts - Church multiplying (Acts 14) and Gospel centered (Acts 15).&nbsp; Dr. Keller later goes on to illustrate that two basic launching models were used to start churches in Acts, 1) using pioneer individuals or 2) using church&nbsp; planting churches.&nbsp; In both cases, there was a connection to a living, healthy church.&nbsp; He goes on to show how most people miss the church planting dimension in Acts since it takes place&nbsp;"normally", "naturally"&nbsp;and "constantly".&nbsp; It was not a sudden, traumatic or episodic happening.&nbsp; He shows that it was more normal than church building programs today.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2"></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2">But some would argue that this view of Acts is not correct:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2"></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT size="2"><FONT face="Arial Narrow"><FONT color="#0000ff">There is a very common objection to reading the book of Acts that way. It goes like this: "That was then! Now, at </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">least in N.America and Europe, we have churches all over the place. We don't need to start new churches, we </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">should strengthen and fill the existing churches before we do that." Here are some answers:</FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"></SPAN><FONT size="2"><FONT face="Arial Narrow"><FONT color="#0000ff">New churches are by far the best way to reach 1) new generations, 2) new residents, and 3) new people groups. </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">Studies show that newer churches attract new groups about 6-10 times better and faster than older churches do. It </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">is because when a church is new, younger and newer people can get in to its leadership faster. It is because when </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">a church is new, it has no tradition and can experiment. It is because when a church is new, its main goal each </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">week is not to satisfy the desires of the long-time members (there are none!) but to reach new people. As a result </FONT><FONT color="#0000ff">new churches are enormously better at reaching new people in a city.</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>  <DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2"></FONT></DIV>  <DIV><SPAN class="546200802-21082006"><FONT face="Arial Narrow" size="2"></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV>]]></description>
		<link>http://shauger.blogspot.com/shauger9_008.htm</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>Bruce Shauger</author>
		<guid>http://shauger.blogspot.com/shauger9_008.htm#1</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
